Appendix A
Division II Deregulation Package
The NCAA Division II Legislation Committee has identified the following proposals to facilitate the deregulation of Division II's legislation related to Bylaws 11 (Conduct and Employment of Athletics Personnel) and 13 (Recruiting). The Division II Presidents Council has approved the submission of these proposals to the membership as a "deregulation package." While these proposals are being submitted as a package, they each will be voted on separately in the appropriate business session.
Note: in the following proposals, those letters and words that appear in italics are to be deleted and those letters and words that appear in bold face are to be added. All page numbers listed refer to the corresponding pages in the 1999-00 NCAA Divison II Manual.
Please Note: While the materials presented on the pages were posted as accurately as possible they are not official publications of the NCAA. The NCAA publications are the only official publications of legislative proposals and should be consulted for all questions related to legislation.
NO. 1 USE OF INSTITUTIONAL NAME OR LOGO
Intent: To eliminate the prohibition of athletics department's staff members using the institution's name or logo in the endorsement of commercial products or services for personal gain without prior written approval by the institution's chief executive officer.
A. Bylaws: Amend 11.1.4, page 53, as follows:
[Division II]
"11.1 CONDUCT OF ATHLETICS PERSONNEL [11.1.1 through 11.1.3, unchanged.] |
||
" |
||
B. Bylaws: 11.3.2.5, page 55, as follows:
"11.3 LIMITATIONS ON COMPENSATION AND REMUNCERATION [11.3.1, unchanged.] |
||
"11.3.1 Income in Addition to Institutional Salary [11.3.2.1 through 11.3.2.4, unchanged.] |
||
|
"11.3.2.5 Endorsement of Commercial Products. Athletics department staff members shall not use, directly or by implication, the institutions name or logo in the endorsement of commercial products or services for personal gain without prior written approval from the institutions chief executive officer in Divisions I and II and without prior approval from the institution in Division III (see 11.2.2)." |
|
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: In the spirit of deregulation, the Division II Legislation Committee believes that it is not necessary to legislate the prohibition of athletics department's staff members utilizing, directly or by implication, the institution's name or logo in the endorsement of commercial products or services for personal gain without prior written approval from the institution's chief executive officer. The committee believes that the institution and copyright laws governing the use of institutional names and logos adequately control this issue.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 2 PERSONNEL -- ATHLETICALLY RELATED INCOME
Intent: To eliminate the requirement than an institution must include, in contracts, and letters of appointment, a stipulation that requires staff members to receive prior approval for the chief executive officer for all athletically related outside income.
Bylaws: Amend 11.2.2, page 54, as follows:
[Division II]
"
(f) Television and radio programs; and |
||
"11.2.2.1 Prior Approval For Institutionally Determined Limited Amount of Income. It is permissible for an institutions chief executive officer to grant general prior written approval for a staff member to receive income that does not exceed an institutionally determined nominal amount (not to exceed $500 per event) for participation in any athletically related activity. A detailed accounting of all such income shall be provided annually in writing by the staff member to the chief executive officer." |
||
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: In the spirit of deregulation, the Division II Legislation Committee believes that this legislation can be eliminated from the Division II manual. In rare occurrences when this legislation does impact Division II institutions, issues relating to athletically related income are more appropriately controlled at the institutional level. Further, in Division II outside income in significant amounts is not common place. Issues relating to outside income should be left to the discretion of the institution.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 3 OUTSIDE INCOME RESTRICTIONS
Intent: To eliminate the outside income restrictions for Division II coaches.
[Division II]
"11.3.2.1 Bona Fide Outside Employment. A staff member may earn income in addition to the institutional salary by performing services for outside groups, provided the compensation is for additional work actually performed and at a rate commensurate with the going rate in that locality for services of like character; further, such outside work must be in conformity with institutional policy and with the approval of the institution. In Divisions I and II, athletically related income requires the prior written approval of the institutions chief executive officer (see 11.2.2). |
B. Bylaws: Amend 11.3.2.2, page 55, as follows:
"11.3.2.2 Supplemental Pay. An outside source is prohibited from paying or regularly supplementing an athletics department staff members annual salary and from arranging to supplement that salary for an unspecified achievement. This includes the donation of cash from outside sources to the institution earmarked for the staff members salary or supplemental income. It would be permissible for an outside source to donate funds to the institution to be used as determined by the institution, and it would be permissible for the institution, at its sole discretion, to use such funds to pay or supplement a staff members salary. |
"11.3.2.3
Bonuses for Specific and Extraordinary Achievement. An institution may permit an outside
individual, group or agency to supplement an athletics department staff members
salary with a direct cash payment in recognition of a specific and extraordinary
achievement (e.g., contribution during career to the athletics department of the
institution, winning a conference or national championship, number of games or meets won
during career/season), provided such a cash supplement is in recognition of a specific
achievement and is in conformance with institutional policy. "11.3.2.4
Extra Compensation Restriction for Division II and Division III Coaches. A member
institution shall not give extra compensation or remuneration of any sort to any coach
conditioned upon or because of the number of games the coachs team wins, or because
the team goes to a bowl game or tournament or participates in championships. These
limitations on extra compensation to coaches do not apply where enforceable contracts or
formal security-of-employment commitments in effect on August 15, 1976, make it impossible
to comply with the limitations. These exceptions are continued until existing contracts or
formal security-of-employment commitments expire. "11.3.2.5
Endorsement of Commercial Products. Athletics department staff members shall not use,
directly or by implication, the institutions name or logo in the endorsement of
commercial products or services for personal gain without prior written approval from the
institutions chief executive officer in Divisions I and II and without prior
approval from the institution in Division III (see 11.2.2). [11.3.2.6 through 11.3.2.8,
unchanged.] "11.3.2.9
Compensation for Scheduling Contests/Individual Participation. Staff members of a member
institutions athletics department shall not accept compensation or gratuities for
scheduling athletics contests or individual meet participation with another institution or
a sponsor of athletics competition. This specifically precludes the acceptance of
compensation or gratuities from other institutions, schedule brokers or agents, and
television networks or syndicators. Staff members shall not accept compensation for
personal appearances (e.g., speaking engagements, clinicians) held in conjunction with the
competition in which the institutions team is a participant. A coach may receive a
participatory gift from the sponsor of an event similar to the gift awarded to
student-athletes participating in the event provided the gift meets the applicable awards
limitation set forth in 16.1.4. "
: Amend 11.3.2.3, page 55, as follows:
Bylaws: Amend 11.3.2.4, page 55, as follows:
Bylaws: Amend 11.3.2.5, page 55, as follows:
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the Division II deregulation project. It was the sense of the Division II Legislation Committee that this legislation is not relevant to Division II in most cases and can be eliminated from the Division II Manual. In rare occurrences when these bylaws do impact Division II institutions, the issues are more appropriately controlled at the institutional level. In Division II, outside income in significant amounts is not common place, further, it should not be legislated that institution's monitor receipt of outside income. The committee believes that this should also be at the discretion of the institution.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 4 EMPLOYMENT WITH PROFESSIONAL SPORTS ORGANIZATIONS NONPERMISSIBLE ARRANGEMENTS
Intent: To permit institutional staff members to be employed by professional sports organizations during times in which they are not under contract to the institution.
[Division II]
| "11.3.3 Employment With Professional Sports Organizations | ||
"11.3.3.1 Nonpermissible Employment Arrangements. Staff members of a member institutions athletics department shall not accept compensation or gratuities for representing a professional sports organization as a coach or scout, in the negotiating of a contract, or for the performance of other services that involve the observation of or contact with athletics talent except during times in which the staff member is not under contract with the institution. Except as provided in 11.3.3.2, any compensational arrangement between a professional sports organization and a college staff member (e.g., for scouting other professional teams or assisting the professional employer in coaching its team) is evidence of an indirect arrangement to assure the staff members assistance in evaluating or procuring college talent. |
||
[Division II]
| "11.3.3.1. Nonpermissible Employment Arrangements | ||
"11.3.3.1.1 Employment During Periods When Not Under Contract With Member Institution. A staff member may not be compensated by a professional sports organization for services rendered during a period in which the staff member is not actually under contract to the institution or is absent from campus (e.g., temporary leave of absence, paid or unpaid). This provision applies to individuals employed by the member institution on a regular and continuing basis, even though the contract may be for a period of less than a full year." |
||
| [11.3.3.1.2 renumbered as 11.3.3.1.1.] | ||
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislative Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the NCAA Division II deregulation project. The Legislation Committee feels employment with professional sports organizations during times a staff member is not under contract with an institution should be permissible in Division II. Division II coaching salaries are, in most cases, not comparable to those in Division I and very often necessitate coaches securing outside employment during the summer when they are normally not under contract to the institution (i.e., Division II coaching contracts are not normally twelve-month contracts). Many times, such employment is available through professional sports organizations. An amendment to this legislation would be deregulation not only because legislation would be deleted but it would also no longer make it necessary for an institution to monitor such outside employment during times when staff members are not under contract to the institution.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 5 PERMISSIBLE EMPLOYMENT OR INCOME ARRANGEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SPORTS ORGANIZATION
Intent: To eliminate legislation stating that it is permissible for employees of the institution, but are not associated with the athletics department, to be employed by professional sports organizations.
Bylaws: Amend Bylaw 11.3.3.2, page 56, as follows:
[Division II]
| "11.3.3.2 Permissible Employment or Income Arrangements | ||
| [Renumber 11.3.3.2.3 and 11.3.3.2.4 renumbered as 11.3.3.2.2 and 11.3.3.2.3, unchanged.] | ||
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the NCAA Division II deregulation project. The Legislation Committee feels that this is repetitive legislation and should be removed from the manual. The committee believes that the language of NCAA Bylaw 11.3.3.1 clearly states that restrictions relating to employment with professional sports organizations applies only to athletics department staff members. In that regard, it should not be necessary to reiterate that staff members in physical education departments who have no relationship to and/or responsibilities in the athletics department are not prohibited from securing employment with a professional sports organization.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 6 RECRUITING TELEPHONE CALLS BY REPRESENTATIVES OF ATHLETICS INTERESTS
Intent: To prohibit "representatives of athletics interest" from making telephone calls to prospective student-athletes.
[Division II]
"13.01.5.2 Division II. In
Division II, representatives of an institutions athletics interests (as defined in
13.02.12) are prohibited from making in-person, off-campus recruiting contacts with a
prospect or the prospects relatives or legal guardians. On-campus contact is
permitted, as are written |
[Division II]
"13.1.2.5 Other Restrictions, Athletics Representatives. The following are additional restrictions that apply to athletics representatives. |
||
" |
Telephone Calls. In Division II, it is permissible for an athletics representative (as defined in 13.02.12) to make telephone calls to a prospect on or after July 1 (August 15 in football) following the prospects completion of the junior year in high school. Any such telephone call must count as the institutions one telephone contact per week;" |
|
[13.1.2.5-(c) through 13.1.2.5-(e), renumbered as 13.1.2.5-(b) through 13.1.2.5-(d), unchanged.] |
||
[Division II]
"13.1.3.4.2 Representatives
of Athletics InterestsDivision II. In Division II, it is not
permissible for an athletics representative (as defined in 13.02.12) to make telephone
calls to a prospect |
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the NCAA Division II deregulation project. Current legislation permits representatives of athletics interests to place phone calls to prospective student-athletes. The Legislation Committee recommends that the legislation be amended to preclude phone calls to prospects by representative of athletics interests. The committee feels this is an important element of Division II deregulation efforts inasmuch as it would eliminate the need for extensive monitoring of phone calls placed by boosters. This will help to alleviate concerns of improper contact and inaccurate information being provided to prospects by non-athletics staff members.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 7 RECRUITING CONTACT AND TELEPHONE CALLS
Intent: To set June 15 immediately preceding the prospect's senior year in high school as the first permissible date for contacts and telephone calls in all Division II sports.
[Division II]
| "13.01.6 Time Periods for Telephone Calls and
Contacts. In Division |
|
" |
|
" |
[Division II]
"13.1.1.1
High-School Prospects. In Division |
|||
" |
|||
" |
|||
|
|
[13.1.1.3-13.1.2.9.2, unchanged] | ||
| "13.1.3 Telephone Calls to Prospects | |||
"13.1.3.1 Time
Period for Telephone Calls General Rule. |
|||
" |
|||
" |
|||
" |
|||
" |
|||
"13.1.3.2 Additional Regulations |
|||
[13.1.3.2.1, unchanged] |
|||
"13.1.3.2.2 Telephone Calls
Initiated by Prospect at Prospects Expense. Institutional staff members may receive
telephone calls placed by a prospect at the prospects own expense at any time,
including prior to |
|||
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the Division II deregulation project. The committee recommends that this legislation should be amended so that the first permissible date for contacts and telephone calls in all sports be June 15 immediately preceding the prospect's senior year in high school. Inasmuch as part of the deregulation charge is to simplify application of legislation and reduce the size of the Division II manual, the committee feels a common date for contacting prospects should exist for all sports. This would simplify the application of recruiting legislation in Division II and would simplify the administrative responsibility for documenting recruiting activities. The June 15 date would precede all current dates. This should alleviate the need for future proposals to continually amend the dates on a sport-by-sport basis.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 8 RECRUITING -- EVALUATIONS
Intent: To eliminate the restriction on the number of evaluations an institution is allowed to have per prospect per academic year.
Bylaws: Amend 13.1.9, pages 84-86, as follows:
[Division II]
"13.1.9
Limitations on Number of Evaluations All Sports. In Division II, there are no
limitations on the number of evaluations an institution is allowed per prospect per
academic year. |
||
" " " " " "
" " " " " " "
" " " " |
||
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the NCAA Division II deregulation project. Division II legislation states that institutional staff members may evaluate the academic and/or athletics ability of a prospect at a site off the institution's campus a maximum of four times per academic year. The committee recommends the elimination of this legislation. The committee feels that a restriction on the number of evaluations is not a practical concept in Division II. Once an institution observes a contest involving a given team four times during the academic year, the institutions is precluded from observing any future contests involving that team during that year. In reality, future evaluations involving this team may very well be for the purpose of evaluating the team's opponents. Current legislation prohibits this possibility often placing undue financial and travel hardships on institutional staff members. This change would allow institutions the latitude to evaluate a team (i.e. junior college or high school) located in close proximity to the institution more than four times most likely for the purpose of evaluating prospects on the opposing team. This would not cause undue pressure on prospective student-athletes inasmuch as contact restrictions would still apply. The definition of an evaluation and the existence of evaluation periods would also still exist.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 9 RECRUITING MATERIALS
Intent: To eliminate the list of permissible recruiting materials that a Division II institution may serve to a prospect.
Bylaws: Amend 13.4.1, page 88-89, as follows:
[Division II]
"13.4.1 Divisions I and
IIPrinted Recruiting Materials. A
"
|
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This is part of the Division II deregulation project. The committee recommends deletion of the list of permissible recruiting materials. The committee advocates retaining the initial date for providing these materials. The committee feels that Division II institutional athletic budgets provide an inherent control over the amount and types of printed material that an institution develops for the purpose of recruiting. Exclusive of media guides, most times the athletic department utilizes printed material developed by the institution's recruiting/admissions office. The committee does not feel that this would be abused inasmuch as most institutional budgets will prohibit institutional personnel from approving the production of "lucrative and excessive" printed materials.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 10 RECRUITING COMPLIMENTARY ADMISSIONS (OFFICIAL VISITS)
Intent: To allow institutions to provide complimentary admissions to prospects on official visits in the same manner such admissions are provided during unofficial visits.
Bylaws: Amend 13.7.5.2, page 94, as follows:
[Division II]
| "13.7.5 Entertainment/Tickets on Official Visit | ||
"13.7.5.2 Complimentary Admissions.
During the official visit, a maximum of three
complimentary admissions to a campus athletics event in
which the institution's intercollegiate team practices or competes may
be provided |
||
| [13.7.5.2.1 through 13.7.5.2.3, unchanged.] | ||
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This proposal is part of the NCAA Division II deregulation project. The Legislation Committee recommends an amendment to the current legislation so that complimentary admissions on official and unofficial visits are administered consistently. The committee feels that it is not necessary to distinguish between official and unofficial visits related to the provision of complimentary admissions. This proposal would make it permissible to provide three complimentary admissions to a campus athletics event for prospects on both official and unofficial visits. These complimentary admissions would be for the exclusive use of the prospect and those persons accompanying the prospect on the visit. Current legislation would continue to control provision of entertainment to high school and two-year college coaches.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum
NO. 11 RECRUITING-DIVISION II TRYOUT
Intent: To permit an institution to provide one tryout per prospect per institution per sport.
Bylaws: Amend 13.12.2.1, pages 100-101, as follows:
[Division II]
|
|
"13.12.2.1 Division II Tryouts. A Division II member institution may conduct a tryout of a prospect only on its campus or at a site at which it normally conducts practice or competition and only under the following conditions (see 17.02.12 for tryouts of currently enrolled students): |
|
|
||
|
Source: NCAA Division II Presidents Council [Management Council (Legislation Committee)].
Effective Date: August 1, 2000.
Rationale: This is part of the Division II deregulation project. Under the current Division II tryout legislation only one tryout per prospect per institution is permitted. This proposal will permit an institution to provide one tryout per prospect per institution per sport. This proposal is consistent with the deregulation project inasmuch as this modification would eliminate "bookkeeping" necessary to "track" the tryout activities of multiple-sport prospective student-athletes.
Post a Comment to FARA Forum